Expected Utility & Risk Aversion

Why decline a fair bet? Concave utility makes the average of utilities less than the utility of the average.

The idea

Expected utility is the standard model of decision-making under risk: a decision maker values not expected wealth but the expected usefulness of wealth. One observation shows the need for it. Offered double-or-nothing on their whole wealth on the toss of a fair coin, almost everyone declines, although the bet leaves expected wealth unchanged — whatever people maximize, it is not expected dollars.

Bernoulli's proposal: fix a utility function $u(W)$, the value of holding wealth $W$, and let the decision maximize the expected utility $\mathbb{E}[u(W)]$ rather than the expected wealth $\mathbb{E}[W]$. The property $u$ needs is concavity — each extra dollar is worth slightly less than the one before it — and $\sqrt{W}$ is the standard concave example.

Concavity explains the refusal, through Jensen's inequality in its concave form.

Theorem (Jensen's inequality, concave form).

If $u$ is concave, then for every random wealth $W$, $u(\mathbb{E}[W]) \ge \mathbb{E}[u(W)].$

So a sure amount is always at least as good as a gamble averaging to it: a fair bet loses in utility. On the graph of $u$, the gamble's value $\mathbb{E}[u(W)]$ lies on the chord between its two outcomes, below the arc at $u(\mathbb{E}[W])$; the gap between them is the utility a fair bet loses. This preference for the sure mean is risk aversion.

Two definitions convert the aversion back into money.

Definition (Certainty equivalent and risk premium).

The certainty equivalent $CE$ of a gamble $W$ is the sure amount valued exactly as highly as the gamble, so that $u(CE) = \mathbb{E}[u(W)]$. The risk premium is $\mathbb{E}[W] - CE$, the expected value the agent will give up to be rid of the uncertainty.

That premium is what an insurer collects.

Ways to work on it

Not sure where to start? Take the ten-question placement test.